MDIH-Ref-Logo.png

On April 2, 2019, residents voted to support the district’s facilities and operating referenda. Your support allows us to address improved safety, accessibility and traffic flow in addition to addressing critical capital maintenance projects and improved learning spaces, while continuing the high quality instructional program our students deserve and our community has come to expect.  We look forward to the design, renovation, and construction process and will continue to keep our community informed regarding the work ahead.  Thank you!  

 

Question #1

requests permission to exceed the district’s state revenue limit by $980,000 per year for ten years to maintain instructional programs, services, and staffing. The district’s current operational referendum of $800,000 per year is expiring in 2019 and this new referendum amount replaces these funds and adjusts for inflation. 

 

Question #2

requests permission to borrow funds (issue debt) in an amount not-to-exceed $16,370,000 to address imminent capital maintenance projects and high priority safety, security and learning space improvements at both Maple Dale and Indian Hill schools.

Maple Dale School copy_edited.png
 

Facilities Assessment and Process

The Facilities Assessment included both of our school buildings and sites and served as a detailed planning document that provided a valuable foundation of information. 

Facilities Assessment Page and Process

Community Survey Regarding Referendum Results

Tax Impact

Click to open in a new window

MDIH-tax-impact.png
 
 

Referendum Information Nights

---

Ask questions, Get Answers!  Attend a Referendum Information Session

 

The Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District is hosting two Referendum Information Sessions. This is your chance to ask questions and get answers about the April 2 referendum. Learn more about the project scope, timing, and more. District staff, along with representatives from Miron Construction and Eppstein Uhen Architects, will be on-hand to answer questions. School tours will be available

 

Wednesday, March 6, 2019 | Maple Dale School | 6:00-7:30 

Monday, March 18, 2019 | Indian Hill School | 6:00-7:30

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

FAQ - Two Ballot Questions

What is the total cost to borrow $16.37 million for the defined referendum projects?


A referendum authorizes borrowing of money for specifically identified purposes. In the case of the April 2 capital referendum, the borrowing may not exceed $16.37 million. Similar to a home purchase and mortgage, there is interest charged to borrow money. The estimated tax impacts provided by Robert W. Baird assumes borrowing over 15 years at interest rates of 3.75% as well as 1% property growth. This is a conservative estimate with interest rates projected above current rates. Interest costs could be less than currently projected and property growth can also fluctuate. Final interest will be known once rates are locked.




If approved, what is the maximum annual tax impact of Question 2?


The capital referendum estimated tax impact will be $116.00 per year for every $100,000 of fair market property value. The total of both questions will be an estimated tax impact of about $133.00 per $100,000 of fair market property value. The capital referendum accounts for $116.00 of the $133.00 total amount. The total amount and the specific amount to each question can be seen below:




Why doesn’t the District use its fund balance to pay for facility improvements?


The District has a long history of sound fiscal stewardship. Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District is one of the few districts in the state that did not have to short-term borrow in the 2018-2019 school year. Short-term borrowing occurs because school districts have expenditures for a fiscal year that begin on July 1; however, state aid and property tax revenues are not received until later in the fiscal year, generally beginning on January 15. Cash is needed to cover expenses during this time. Most school districts borrow money to “bridge a gap” until the receipt of revenue, which costs additional interest. In addition to avoiding short-term borrowing, a healthy fund balance allows our District to make special purchases or cover unforeseen expenditures (including maintenance and repairs) as well as enhance our bond rating by demonstrating financial stability. A strong bond rating will provide lower interest rates on future debt issuance. We do plan on utilizing some funds from the Fund Balance to cover the costs of furniture and technology alongside the capital referendum to provide refreshed spaces for our students and community.




Is it possible that following a comprehensive and collaborative design process, the costs will be much more or much less than $16.37 million?


No, it is not possible to exceed the defined project scope or cost of $16.37 million. At the conclusion of all projects, any monies left over are credited to the District.




If the referendum does not pass, will the District consider an alternate plan?


If the operational referendum fails, the District will:

  • Utilize fund balance to cover staffing costs for the 2019-20 school year and minimize expenses were possible.
  • Review class size, educational programs and staffing to offset the loss of revenue.
  • Re-engage the community and review priority educational and operational needs for a potential future referendum.
If the capital referendum fails, the District will:
  • Address emergency repairs only in the 2019-20 school year and create a long-term plan to address critical needs. However, these funds will need to be taken from operational funds, which could impact staffing, student programming and other educational areas.
  • Re-engage the community to modify the recommended plan for a potential future referendum
We strongly believe that we have done a thorough and comprehensive study of our buildings, engaged the community in discussions and surveyed members of our municipalities. We would not put forth referenda questions that we were not confident with moving forward.





FAQ - Operational Referendum (Question Number 1)

Did we explore consolidation with local districts?


Yes, as part of our strategic planning process we conducted a financial and legal analysis of consolidation with our partner school districts of Fox Point-Bayside, Glendale-River Hills and Nicolet High School. Preliminary findings show a slight increase in taxes and decrease in per student spending should we consolidate. We continue to look for ways to consolidate services across districts to create efficient and effective service for our students. Currently, we share transportation and food services. We also work across systems to align curriculum and instruction. For some more information on consolidation efforts, see this article from JSOnline. The study, provided by Robert W. Baird & Co. and Wisconsin Association of School Boards (WASB) was presented on May 17, 2018. The corresponding documents from the presentation can be found here:




Have we considered consolidating into one location for all students and creating one K-8 school? Did we explore replacing either Indian Hill or Maple Dale?


Yes, as part of our comprehensive facilities assessment we examined consolidation of schools to one campus. The analysis showed that the site plans and costs do not support relocating to a single campus. That comprehensive facilities assessment can be found here.





FAQ - Capital Improvements (Question Number 2)

Did we explore consolidation with local districts?


Yes, as part of our strategic planning process we conducted a financial and legal analysis of consolidation with our partner school districts of Fox Point-Bayside, Glendale-River Hills and Nicolet High School. Preliminary findings show a slight increase in taxes and decrease in per student spending should we consolidate. We continue to look for ways to consolidate services across districts to create efficient and effective service for our students. Currently, we share transportation and food services. We also work across systems to align curriculum and instruction. For some more information on consolidation efforts, see this article from JSOnline. The study, provided by Robert W. Baird & Co. and Wisconsin Association of School Boards (WASB) was presented on May 17, 2018. The corresponding documents from the presentation can be found here:




Have we considered consolidating into one location for all students and creating one K-8 school? Did we explore replacing either Indian Hill or Maple Dale?


Yes, as part of our comprehensive facilities assessment we examined consolidation of schools to one campus. The analysis showed that the site plans and costs do not support relocating to a single campus. That comprehensive facilities assessment can be found here.





FAQ - Classroom Updates

What Is The Role Of An Architect?


The architect’s (EUA) primary role is to develop a practical design that provides long-term solutions to the challenges presented by its client, in this case, the Maple Dale- Indian Hill School District (Owner). It is the responsibility of the architect to assemble, manage and coordinate a multi-disciplined team of engineers and other specialty consultants who will collaborate together to develop the construction documents needed by the Construction Manager for bidding the work to various trades. The architect and Construction Manager work collaboratively during document development to identify practical, cost-effective building systems that provide long-term durability to the District. The architect also serves as one of the three main parts of the overall project team:

  1. Owner - Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District
  2. Architect - EUA
  3. Construction Manager - Miron
Each serve as a check and balance for the other two. The architect is part of the review of all construction bids to ensure intent and scope are accurately reflected. During construction, the architect serves as a resource to the construction manager to review field questions, review the detailed shop drawings prepared by individual trades and observe construction progress to ensure conformance with documents.




How Were The Facilities Assessed?


As part of the District’s broader Strategic Planning process, the Maple Dale Indian Hill School Board selected Eppstein Uhen Architects (EUA) in February 2018 to complete a comprehensive Facilities Assessment as the first step in developing a long-term facilities plan. The Facilities Assessment included both of our school buildings and sites and will served as a detailed planning document that provides a valuable foundation of information. This data supported the School Board’s prioritization of facility needs and improvements to provide high-quality learning environments while developing fiscally responsible, long-term facilities solutions. EUA’s summary findings of the Facilities Assessment were presented to the School Board on Thursday, May 3, 2018. The School Board will also hosted interactive workshops for staff and the community to discuss the Facilities Assessment findings and to gather input to guide facilities-related decision making.




What Is The Architectural & Engineering Design Fee?


The school district went through a competitive bid process to interview several architectural/engineering firms who all provided fees to serve this project from inception to occupancy (approximately four years of service to the district). The district hired the firm that provided the best balance of experience, leadership, engagement, design, references, and overall value. The fees range from 5% to 6% per building and are based on the total cost of construction.




What Is The Role Of A Construction Manager (CM)?


Miron Construction Co., Inc. (Miron) was selected as the district construction management firm. They are not responsible for the design of buildings or defining the scope of work. They are responsible for establishing costs to solutions developed by the District Administration, Staff, and Community with the architects and adopted by the Maple Dale-Indian Hill Board of Education. In addition, they provide budgeting throughout the design process to ensure the projects stay on budget. As part of their work they manage the construction administration process including bidding of all subcontracts, scoping of subcontractors, recommendation of award for subcontractors, issuing of contracts for subcontractors, document control including all Request for Information (RFI) and submittals. Construction managers oversee bonding, insurance, constructability, phasing, scheduling, managing district direct purchases, and supervision of the work.




What Is The Construction Manager (CM) Fee?


The Construction Manager fee is 2.0% of the total construction costs. This fee plays five important roles for our projects:

  1. Accurate Cost Estimates: Competitively bid all relevant projects
  2. Project Supervision: Supervise all subcontractors and suppliers and oversee quality and safety control on all projects, including any warranty related work
  3. Constructability: Provide guidance on the most cost effective means and methods of construction
  4. Phasing Schedules: Develop, maintain, and manage the construction schedule minimizing disruption to students and staff
  5. Community Engagement / Communication: Create transparency with our community
Ultimately, the Construction Manager plays an important role in the pre-construction (project cost, schedule and design) as well as during the construction (bid process, manage activity on site and maintain a safe work environment).




How Was The Construction Manager Selected?


A competitive Request For Proposal Process (RFP) process was utilized and four different firms were invited to submit their interest, qualifications and fee proposals. The process and criteria included cost analysis, reference checks, analysis of prior K-12 projects, and assessment of the firm’s workloads and feasibility of successfully being able to manage projects.





FAQ - Safety & Security Upgrades

If the referendum is approved by the community, will work be competitively bid out?


Yes. The construction manager and the District will competitively bid subcontractors with the first bid projected for January of 2020.




What is the timeline for construction if the referendum passes?


If the community approves the $16.37 million referendum on April 2, design planning for each building, including HVAC and Security Entrances, would begin immediately and last through the fall of 2019. Bidding would take place in early 2020 and followed by construction from Spring of 2020 through early 2021. None of the construction will impact student learning.





FAQ - Costs For The Capital Referendum - Question 2

What is the total cost to borrow $16.37 million for the defined referendum projects?


A referendum authorizes borrowing of money for specifically identified purposes. In the case of the April 2 capital referendum, the borrowing may not exceed $16.37 million. Similar to a home purchase and mortgage, there is interest charged to borrow money. The estimated tax impacts provided by Robert W. Baird assumes borrowing over 15 years at interest rates of 3.75% as well as 1% property growth. This is a conservative estimate with interest rates projected above current rates. Interest costs could be less than currently projected and property growth can also fluctuate. Final interest will be known once rates are locked.




If approved, what is the maximum annual tax impact of Question 2?


The capital referendum estimated tax impact will be $116.00 per year for every $100,000 of fair market property value. The total of both questions will be an estimated tax impact of about $133.00 per $100,000 of fair market property value. The capital referendum accounts for $116.00 of the $133.00 total amount. The total amount and the specific amount to each question can be seen below:




Why doesn’t the District use its fund balance to pay for facility improvements?


The District has a long history of sound fiscal stewardship. Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District is one of the few districts in the state that did not have to short-term borrow in the 2018-2019 school year. Short-term borrowing occurs because school districts have expenditures for a fiscal year that begin on July 1; however, state aid and property tax revenues are not received until later in the fiscal year, generally beginning on January 15. Cash is needed to cover expenses during this time. Most school districts borrow money to “bridge a gap” until the receipt of revenue, which costs additional interest. In addition to avoiding short-term borrowing, a healthy fund balance allows our District to make special purchases or cover unforeseen expenditures (including maintenance and repairs) as well as enhance our bond rating by demonstrating financial stability. A strong bond rating will provide lower interest rates on future debt issuance. We do plan on utilizing some funds from the Fund Balance to cover the costs of furniture and technology alongside the capital referendum to provide refreshed spaces for our students and community.




Is it possible that following a comprehensive and collaborative design process, the costs will be much more or much less than $16.37 million?


No, it is not possible to exceed the defined project scope or cost of $16.37 million. At the conclusion of all projects, any monies left over are credited to the District.




If the referendum does not pass, will the District consider an alternate plan?


If the operational referendum fails, the District will:

  • Utilize fund balance to cover staffing costs for the 2019-20 school year and minimize expenses were possible.
  • Review class size, educational programs and staffing to offset the loss of revenue.
  • Re-engage the community and review priority educational and operational needs for a potential future referendum.
If the capital referendum fails, the District will:
  • Address emergency repairs only in the 2019-20 school year and create a long-term plan to address critical needs. However, these funds will need to be taken from operational funds, which could impact staffing, student programming and other educational areas.
  • Re-engage the community to modify the recommended plan for a potential future referendum
We strongly believe that we have done a thorough and comprehensive study of our buildings, engaged the community in discussions and surveyed members of our municipalities. We would not put forth referenda questions that we were not confident with moving forward.





FAQ - Consolidation Of Schools Or Districts

Did we explore consolidation with local districts?


Yes, as part of our strategic planning process we conducted a financial and legal analysis of consolidation with our partner school districts of Fox Point-Bayside, Glendale-River Hills and Nicolet High School. Preliminary findings show a slight increase in taxes and decrease in per student spending should we consolidate. We continue to look for ways to consolidate services across districts to create efficient and effective service for our students. Currently, we share transportation and food services. We also work across systems to align curriculum and instruction. For some more information on consolidation efforts, see this article from JSOnline. The study, provided by Robert W. Baird & Co. and Wisconsin Association of School Boards (WASB) was presented on May 17, 2018. The corresponding documents from the presentation can be found here:




Have we considered consolidating into one location for all students and creating one K-8 school? Did we explore replacing either Indian Hill or Maple Dale?


Yes, as part of our comprehensive facilities assessment we examined consolidation of schools to one campus. The analysis showed that the site plans and costs do not support relocating to a single campus. That comprehensive facilities assessment can be found here.





FAQ - Role Of The Architect And Construction Manager

What Is The Role Of An Architect?


The architect’s (EUA) primary role is to develop a practical design that provides long-term solutions to the challenges presented by its client, in this case, the Maple Dale- Indian Hill School District (Owner). It is the responsibility of the architect to assemble, manage and coordinate a multi-disciplined team of engineers and other specialty consultants who will collaborate together to develop the construction documents needed by the Construction Manager for bidding the work to various trades. The architect and Construction Manager work collaboratively during document development to identify practical, cost-effective building systems that provide long-term durability to the District. The architect also serves as one of the three main parts of the overall project team:

  1. Owner - Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District
  2. Architect - EUA
  3. Construction Manager - Miron
Each serve as a check and balance for the other two. The architect is part of the review of all construction bids to ensure intent and scope are accurately reflected. During construction, the architect serves as a resource to the construction manager to review field questions, review the detailed shop drawings prepared by individual trades and observe construction progress to ensure conformance with documents.




How Were The Facilities Assessed?


As part of the District’s broader Strategic Planning process, the Maple Dale Indian Hill School Board selected Eppstein Uhen Architects (EUA) in February 2018 to complete a comprehensive Facilities Assessment as the first step in developing a long-term facilities plan. The Facilities Assessment included both of our school buildings and sites and will served as a detailed planning document that provides a valuable foundation of information. This data supported the School Board’s prioritization of facility needs and improvements to provide high-quality learning environments while developing fiscally responsible, long-term facilities solutions. EUA’s summary findings of the Facilities Assessment were presented to the School Board on Thursday, May 3, 2018. The School Board will also hosted interactive workshops for staff and the community to discuss the Facilities Assessment findings and to gather input to guide facilities-related decision making.




What Is The Architectural & Engineering Design Fee?


The school district went through a competitive bid process to interview several architectural/engineering firms who all provided fees to serve this project from inception to occupancy (approximately four years of service to the district). The district hired the firm that provided the best balance of experience, leadership, engagement, design, references, and overall value. The fees range from 5% to 6% per building and are based on the total cost of construction.




What Is The Role Of A Construction Manager (CM)?


Miron Construction Co., Inc. (Miron) was selected as the district construction management firm. They are not responsible for the design of buildings or defining the scope of work. They are responsible for establishing costs to solutions developed by the District Administration, Staff, and Community with the architects and adopted by the Maple Dale-Indian Hill Board of Education. In addition, they provide budgeting throughout the design process to ensure the projects stay on budget. As part of their work they manage the construction administration process including bidding of all subcontracts, scoping of subcontractors, recommendation of award for subcontractors, issuing of contracts for subcontractors, document control including all Request for Information (RFI) and submittals. Construction managers oversee bonding, insurance, constructability, phasing, scheduling, managing district direct purchases, and supervision of the work.




What Is The Construction Manager (CM) Fee?


The Construction Manager fee is 2.0% of the total construction costs. This fee plays five important roles for our projects:

  1. Accurate Cost Estimates: Competitively bid all relevant projects
  2. Project Supervision: Supervise all subcontractors and suppliers and oversee quality and safety control on all projects, including any warranty related work
  3. Constructability: Provide guidance on the most cost effective means and methods of construction
  4. Phasing Schedules: Develop, maintain, and manage the construction schedule minimizing disruption to students and staff
  5. Community Engagement / Communication: Create transparency with our community
Ultimately, the Construction Manager plays an important role in the pre-construction (project cost, schedule and design) as well as during the construction (bid process, manage activity on site and maintain a safe work environment).




How Was The Construction Manager Selected?


A competitive Request For Proposal Process (RFP) process was utilized and four different firms were invited to submit their interest, qualifications and fee proposals. The process and criteria included cost analysis, reference checks, analysis of prior K-12 projects, and assessment of the firm’s workloads and feasibility of successfully being able to manage projects.





FAQ - Timelines, Design & Construction And Implementation

If the referendum is approved by the community, will work be competitively bid out?


Yes. The construction manager and the District will competitively bid subcontractors with the first bid projected for January of 2020.




What is the timeline for construction if the referendum passes?


If the community approves the $16.37 million referendum on April 2, design planning for each building, including HVAC and Security Entrances, would begin immediately and last through the fall of 2019. Bidding would take place in early 2020 and followed by construction from Spring of 2020 through early 2021. None of the construction will impact student learning.





FAQ - Miscellaneous

What is the total cost to borrow $16.37 million for the defined referendum projects?


A referendum authorizes borrowing of money for specifically identified purposes. In the case of the April 2 capital referendum, the borrowing may not exceed $16.37 million. Similar to a home purchase and mortgage, there is interest charged to borrow money. The estimated tax impacts provided by Robert W. Baird assumes borrowing over 15 years at interest rates of 3.75% as well as 1% property growth. This is a conservative estimate with interest rates projected above current rates. Interest costs could be less than currently projected and property growth can also fluctuate. Final interest will be known once rates are locked.




If approved, what is the maximum annual tax impact of Question 2?


The capital referendum estimated tax impact will be $116.00 per year for every $100,000 of fair market property value. The total of both questions will be an estimated tax impact of about $133.00 per $100,000 of fair market property value. The capital referendum accounts for $116.00 of the $133.00 total amount. The total amount and the specific amount to each question can be seen below:




Why doesn’t the District use its fund balance to pay for facility improvements?


The District has a long history of sound fiscal stewardship. Maple Dale-Indian Hill School District is one of the few districts in the state that did not have to short-term borrow in the 2018-2019 school year. Short-term borrowing occurs because school districts have expenditures for a fiscal year that begin on July 1; however, state aid and property tax revenues are not received until later in the fiscal year, generally beginning on January 15. Cash is needed to cover expenses during this time. Most school districts borrow money to “bridge a gap” until the receipt of revenue, which costs additional interest. In addition to avoiding short-term borrowing, a healthy fund balance allows our District to make special purchases or cover unforeseen expenditures (including maintenance and repairs) as well as enhance our bond rating by demonstrating financial stability. A strong bond rating will provide lower interest rates on future debt issuance. We do plan on utilizing some funds from the Fund Balance to cover the costs of furniture and technology alongside the capital referendum to provide refreshed spaces for our students and community.




Is it possible that following a comprehensive and collaborative design process, the costs will be much more or much less than $16.37 million?


No, it is not possible to exceed the defined project scope or cost of $16.37 million. At the conclusion of all projects, any monies left over are credited to the District.




If the referendum does not pass, will the District consider an alternate plan?


If the operational referendum fails, the District will:

  • Utilize fund balance to cover staffing costs for the 2019-20 school year and minimize expenses were possible.
  • Review class size, educational programs and staffing to offset the loss of revenue.
  • Re-engage the community and review priority educational and operational needs for a potential future referendum.
If the capital referendum fails, the District will:
  • Address emergency repairs only in the 2019-20 school year and create a long-term plan to address critical needs. However, these funds will need to be taken from operational funds, which could impact staffing, student programming and other educational areas.
  • Re-engage the community to modify the recommended plan for a potential future referendum
We strongly believe that we have done a thorough and comprehensive study of our buildings, engaged the community in discussions and surveyed members of our municipalities. We would not put forth referenda questions that we were not confident with moving forward.





 

Preliminary Floor Plans

---

(Click the image for full view)

MDIH-Referendum-Floor-Plans.jpg
 

In the News

---

Journal Sentinel - March 4, 2019
"Five things to know about the Maple Dale-Indian Hill referendum"

WISN 12 News - February 8, 2019

"River Hills school evacuated because of heat outage"

 
 

Voting Information

---
Please vote on April 2, 2019!
Visit MyVoteWI

---

Vote Early in Your Municipal Clerk’s Office 

Early in-person voting is open from March 18 to March 29; check with your municipality directly

for the specific hours. A photo ID is required to vote in Wisconsin.
 


Village of Bayside
9075 North Regent Rd.
Bayside, WI 53217-1802 
414/206-3913


Village of Fox Point
7200 North Santa Monica Blvd.
Fox Point, WI 53217-3505
414/351-8900 x6621


City of Glendale
5909 North Milwaukee River Pkwy.
Glendale, WI 53209
Phone: 414/228-1718


Village of River Hills
7650 North Pheasant Ln.
River Hills, WI 53217-3012
414/352-8213


Sample Ballots
Sample ballots for the next election will be available at Wisconsin Voter Information website

---

Polling Places

Voter Photo ID
Voter Photo ID is required to receive a ballot in all special and regular elections.  Please be prepared with your photo ID at the next election.  Election Inspectors will be required through legislative action to ask for Voter Photo ID, along with a voter's signature to receive a ballot.


As typical with past elections for Wisconsin State Voter Registration applications, voters are required to provide proof of residence when registering to vote.  

 

Other Ways to Vote
Are you unable to vote at your polling place on Election Day? Take advantage of one of these other options.
Wisconsin voters can receive their absentee ballot by mail. If you are a regular voter who would like to vote in the 2019 Spring Election, make sure to submit your request for an absentee ballot by March 28, 2019.
Request an Absentee Ballot

 

Receive Automatic Absentee Ballots

Receive a ballot for every election by mail.  If you are unable to go to your polling place on Election Day due to age, illness, disability or infirmity, you can request an absentee ballot be sent to you for every election, automatically, as an “indefinitely confined elector.”  Request Automatic Absentee Ballots
 

Village of Bayside - Wards 2, 4
9075 N. Regent Rd., Bayside, WI 53217-1802 

 

Polling Place Hours: Tuesday, April 2, 2019, 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM

Village of Fox Point - Wards 6, 7, 8, 9
Longacre Pavilion

7343 N. Longacre Rd., Fox Point, WI 53217


Polling Place Hours: Tuesday, April 2, 2019, 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM

City Of Glendale - Aldermanic District 3/Ward 9
Cardinal Stritch University, Voting Room: Bonaventure Hall

104 N. Kent Ave., Glendale, WI 53217


Polling Place Hours: Tuesday, April 2, 2019,
7:00 AM - 8:00 PM

Village of River Hills - Wards 2, 3
7650 North Pheasant Ln. River Hills, WI 53217


Polling Place Hours: Tuesday, April 2, 2019, 7:00 AM - 8:00 PM